Comments
  1. The AtlanticRoss Andersen7/29/2038 min
    5 reads2 comments
    10
    The Atlantic
    5 reads
    10
    You must read the article before you can comment on it.
    • jwigdor4 years ago

      A chilling blend of direct interview, personal reflection, and science-not-so-fiction that’s required to conceive the origin and direction of China’s surveillance state.

      Not just the technology itself but it’s especially unsettling implementation: “False positives—deeming someone a threat for innocuous behavior—would be encouraged, in order to boost the system’s built-in chilling effects, so that she’d turn her sharp eyes on her own behavior, to avoid the slightest appearance of dissent.“

    • bartadamley
      Top reader this weekReading streak
      4 years ago

      It feels as though one is reading Orwell's 1984, while reading the real-world examples of how a government body is using the latest technologies to create a surveillance state.

      The party’s ability to edit history and culture, by force, will become more sweeping and precise, as China’s AI improves.

      Each time a person’s face is recognized, or her voice recorded, or her text messages intercepted, this information could be attached, instantly, to her government-ID number, police records, tax returns, property filings, and employment history. It could be cross-referenced with her medical records and DNA, of which the Chinese police boast they have the world’s largest collection.

      The ultimate permanent record that we thought existed as a child, is disturbingly coming to fruition in an entirely different form.

      The political systems that constrain a technology during its early development profoundly shape our shared global future.

      All 3 of these quotes symbolize the sheer importance of understanding what is happening in China with their usage of Artificial Intelligence.