Comments
  1. You must read the article before you can comment on it.
    • jeff
      Scout
      6 years ago

      Turns out the internet is LITERALLY destroying our brains!

      ...well maybe. It would be cool to see the results of a non-cross-sectional study with a greater number of participants.

      • appletester3 years ago

        Test reply

      • turtlebubble6 years ago

        and also compared to other less instantaneous methods of gratification. Social media and email notifications are among the simplest and least engaging reward activities. How does gray matter volume relate to those who exercise or reallyread,it often?

        • jeff
          Scout
          6 years ago

          How does gray matter volume relate to those who exercise or reallyread,it often?

          In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, I'm going to choose to believe that spending time on reallyread.it results in massive gray matter gains (assuming that's even possible!).

          Seriously though, these articles always make me wish I paid more attention in statistics. I feel like the journalists writing about the studies always try to hype up the findings regardless of the actual statistical significance.

    • zreader6 years ago

      walker clayton = zero gray matter

      • bill
        Top reader of all time
        6 years ago

        but he's so loved by so many!

    • erica6 years ago

      This article is so creepy! I agree that 85 people doesn't seem statistically significant compared to the world population...Still an interesting study, though. At least the authors admit the distinction between correlation and causation. I wonder how they define "normal smartphone usage."

      • bill
        Top reader of all time
        6 years ago

        Even crazier: I'm using reallyread.it on my smartphone right now. Simultaneously stoked and not stoked about that right now.

    • jamie6 years ago

      interesting article, it barely touched the age issue, are very young children more at risk based on the fact that their brains may be still developing? Seems like whenever I am in a restaurant a parent is propping up a toddler with a device. there must be some studies about computer toddler use and the brain...... and what about the social component? I am not sure what the studies will show with brain development but aren't these young souls losing the connections to real human contact? Isn't the social development even more important than the cognitive development at that age? Just wonderin'???