I felt that this was a very weak article. Many points were left unsupported and overall it was extremely biased. I cannot say I learned anything from reading it.
I am not sure what the point of the article is. It touched on Warren’s story, her ideas, how she compares to other candidates and whether a detailed policy platform is even a good thing but didn’t leave me feeling significantly better informed about any of those subjects.
I still don’t fully understand the antitrust logic, which everyone (including Warren) seems to summarize as “you can’t build a marketplace and participate on the marketplace at the same time.” There might be a better antitrust mission statement, but it needs a few more iterations.
The native blood thing is a heavy cringe, but it’s time for us, as a society, to more deeply unpack the whole affirmative action situation anyway - the dark side of identity politics. We’ve all got blood on our hands, so we need to stop pointing fingers. Oh, and eat the rich
I felt that this was a very weak article. Many points were left unsupported and overall it was extremely biased. I cannot say I learned anything from reading it.
I am not sure what the point of the article is. It touched on Warren’s story, her ideas, how she compares to other candidates and whether a detailed policy platform is even a good thing but didn’t leave me feeling significantly better informed about any of those subjects.
Bad title. Above average, medium-length article.
I still don’t fully understand the antitrust logic, which everyone (including Warren) seems to summarize as “you can’t build a marketplace and participate on the marketplace at the same time.” There might be a better antitrust mission statement, but it needs a few more iterations.
The native blood thing is a heavy cringe, but it’s time for us, as a society, to more deeply unpack the whole affirmative action situation anyway - the dark side of identity politics. We’ve all got blood on our hands, so we need to stop pointing fingers. Oh, and eat the rich