Comments
  1. Experimental HistoryAdam Mastroianni2/23/228 min
    7 reads3 comments
    10
    Experimental History
    7 reads
    10
    You must read the article before you can comment on it.
    • coriander
      Scout
      1 year ago

      Really good stuff in here.

      The one point I find tricky is the part about fast responses—I find this does work well when people are “in the zone” together, but if one person’s in the zone and the other isn’t in the same zone, it can just feel like interrupting/not fully listening and then it doesn’t create that floating/nicely bouncing off each other quality.

      So it’s a tricky dance in practice, but the suggestion to offer some craggy affordances is a good, practical one!

      • thorgalle
        Top reader this weekReading streakScoutScribe
        1 year ago

        Appropriate side note! I also have experienced wanting to get out of a conversations that I’m sure felt zone-y for the other person, where I grudgingly took the obvious doorknobs, to not offend them. When that zone happens with both people though, it’s amazing how you can start at one conversation point and end at the metaphorical other end of the world.

    • thorgalle
      Top reader this weekReading streakScoutScribe
      1 year ago

      Develops into some really practical advice! Interesting points about people preferring mundane topics over supposedly impressive feats, and questions that veil egocentricity (I think I’m guilty of those sometimes).