Comments
  1. washingtonpost5/30/196 min
    4 reads1 comment
    5.3
    washingtonpost
    4 reads
    5.3
    You must read the article before you can comment on it.
    • samar4 years ago

      “Using Twitter reduced performance on the test by about 25 to 40 percent of a standard deviation from the average result, as the paper explains.” Interesting results. Probably agree with the overall hypothesis. But not sure if it’s just a twitter problem. I feel like the methodology used could have yielded the same result for any second hand source of information.